Material Escalation and The Ultimate Risk Bearer

Material Escalation And The Ultimate Risk BearerGiven the current environment, heavy emphasis is placed on material price escalation in construction projects and contracts. As construction material pricing reaches historical volatility levels, the question on everyone’s mind is, who bears the risk that will inevitably result from such a volatile market? And how can we mitigate such risks?

Three Types of Pricing Structures for Construction Agreements

When contemplating who will bear the risk of material price escalation, the contracting parties should first determine the type of contract pricing structure. Some of the most commonly used construction contract structures include the following: (1) fixed-price contract; (2) cost plus fee contract; and (3) cost plus fee with guaranteed maximum price contract.

Fixed-Price Contracts

Fixed-price or “hard bid” contracts are structured so that the contractor bears the risk of material price escalation because the price is fixed and not subject to adjustment due to changing market conditions. In other words, if that contract is signed on the first of the month, material prices spike shortly thereafter so that the pricing proposal received by the contractor from the subcontractor on which that fixed-price was based are no longer honored, the contractor will have to absorb the price increase and will, therefore, lose anticipated profits on that fixed-price contract.

Cost-Plus Contracts

Cost-plus contracts result in the owner absorbing the risk of material price escalations. The owner may not favor this contract pricing structure because there is no cap on pricing, making financial budgeting difficult. However, a mitigating factor is the contractor is typically required to keep the owner apprised of all known material price increases.

Cost-Plus Fee with a Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts

A cost-plus fee with a guaranteed maximum price (“GMP”) contract is structured to protect the owner and the contractor. This contract structure permits the contractor to reduce the risk toward price escalation by factoring in potential material escalation costs as a contingency or allowance line item. These material escalation provisions vary significantly and may include such elements as thresholds (i.e., price adjustment not allowed unless there is a 10% increase in material prices) based on an established baseline costs on which the GMP is based, financial caps, or that the price escalation must result in actual GMP being exceeded which was unavoidable by the contractor exercising commercially reasonable best efforts.

More Than One Way to Skin a Cat

Mitigating Material Price Escalation

Material price escalation can be mitigated before a contract has ever been signed or agreed upon. Contractors can mitigate this risk by placing language in their bid proposals that establish a period of time in which their proposal must be accepted to be valid. This approach would allow the contractor bidding the job to update their pricing and proposal to reflect any increases or decreases after the allowed time has passed. However, contractors need to watch out for any bid instructions or RFP documents that preemptively exclude any price increases or require bids to remain valid for a specified period of time.

Additionally, locking in pricing (or “buy out”) as quickly as possible can serve to guard against material price escalation, but owners must be willing to allow contractors to bill, and be paid for, these commitments when made. To that end, if the contractor can identify materials with the most price volatility, it may be an option to buy those materials in advance and store them, assuming the owner is willing to make the requisite cash flow available.

Without a Crystal Ball

It has become commonplace to heavily scrutinize excusable delay or force majeure provisions in construction contracts. Without going too far into this since it is worthy of its own article, it is advisable to review these types of provisions carefully. The contract law doctrine says the specific will control over general provisions. Case law indicates that courts will look more favorably to grant relief for specific force majeure provisions versus the general “beyond contractor’s reasonable control.” Further, case law indicates that creating general categories prior to “beyond contractor’s reasonable control” will be interpreted more favorably and relief granted for the specific event.

For example, if a tsunami hits a project site and you failed to mention unusually adverse weather or acts of God preceding “or anything beyond contractor’s reasonable control,” it is less likely that relief will be granted. Moreover, it is important to be mindful of any “not reasonably foreseeable or anticipated” or similar qualifiers with force majeure.

Additionally, COVID-19 is not your typical force majeure event. Most force majeure events, such as unusually adverse weather, are relatively sudden and temporary in nature. But COVID-19 is an ongoing occurrence and impacts unknown, making it difficult to identify specific events or understand such potential impacts. For example, it could be argued that hurricanes in Florida are reasonably foreseeable or anticipated during hurricane season. With regard to COVID-19 impacts, it is more challenging to take a position that impacts are not reasonably foreseeable or anticipated for a construction contract entered into in June 2021 versus one entered into in June 2019.

Regarding excusable delay or force majeure provisions, it is common in construction contracts to state whether the contractor is entitled to additional money or just additional time.

Lastly, it is important to consider the interplay of these provisions with other provisions of the contract. For example, it is market standard to include a mutual waiver of consequential damages. It could be argued, without clarification in the contract documents, that material price increases are consequential in nature. So it is important to include examples in the contract of what is to be considered consequential damages.

*          *          *

In conclusion, there are a variety of approaches to mitigate the risk of material escalation depending on the pricing model selected for construction contracts. While none of these will completely insulate and shed all risk, these are some helpful mechanisms to manage this risk. Regardless of which approach is taken, it is critical that project teams at all levels with responsibility for administering the contract clearly understand the inner workings of these mechanisms in the contract so that the intended benefit can be fully realized and cost-overruns can be either avoided or properly managed to the extent possible.

About the Author

More Articles

About the Author

4 Responses

  1. Theoretically, neither contractor nor owner benefits from cost escalation: contractors’ cost escalation premiums are passed through to their suppliers and owners still receive the same scope and specifications. To increase the likelihood of an equitable resolution, the development — and subsequent review — of material escalation claims should address qualitative and quantitative factors.

  2. I adore your content regarding In construction projects and contracts, material price inflation is given a lot of weight given the existing conditions. With the price of building materials reaching previously unheard-of levels of volatility, everyone is wondering: who is going to take the risk that comes with such a volatile market? And how might these hazards be reduced? I sincerely hope it will benefit a lot of people. Appreciative your content! One must check this it gives us more info on this topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

How to Draft an Arbitration Clause: 4 Key Considerations

A poorly drafted arbitration clause may lead to months of pre-merit disputes on matters of jurisdiction or, even

Construction Contract Drafting Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

A single contract drafting mistake can lead to negative profit margins, strained relationships, or even the administration of

Order of Precedence Clauses & Alternatives

In long agreements with multiple drafters, an order of precedence clause can be used to ensure the intended

Understanding Advancements in Autorenewal Laws

States are enacting autorenewal laws that businesses with consumer-facing autorenewal terms should be aware of.

Most Recent

How to Draft an Arbitration Clause: 4 Key Considerations

A poorly drafted arbitration clause may lead to months of pre-merit disputes on matters of jurisdiction or, even

Ten Awesomely Nerdy Holiday Gifts for the Contract Nerd in Your Life

A list of ten nerdy cool gifts to consider getting a special contracts professional in your life this

Beyond the Signature: How to Extract Maximum Value from Your Contracts

Leverage the data contained within your signed contracts to extract maximum value for your organization.

Design Matters: Revamping Contracts for Impact and Clarity

A few tweaks based on strong design principles can transform your contracts, saving you time and helping you

Subscribe to Contract Nerds weekly newsletter

* indicates required
Professional Role
Contract Nerds Logo

Download PDF

[download id='9545']
Generic filters