Common Negotiation Points in Technology Agreements


KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Understand how autorenewals may impact pricing and financing.
  • Maintain an iron grasp of your intellectual property rights.
  • Protect yourself from unforeseen events with limitation of liability and indemnification clauses.

The negotiation process for technology agreements can often be a maze of legal terms and technical jargon, a dance between parties seeking to achieve their objectives while safeguarding their interests. The importance of preparation, clear communication, and understanding your negotiating counterpart’s needs cannot be overstated. It’s a delicate balance, but one that can yield fruitful results when done correctly.

This article outlines three common negotiation points in technology agreements as well as ways to promote fair negotiation discussions.

Negotiation Point #1 – Prices and Financing Limits

The essence of technology contracts is the exchange of development, sale, or licensing of tech products, services, or IP. As such, prices and financing limits tend to be critical. They are the lifeblood of the agreement, the backbone of the financial commitment that both parties are entering into. It is vital to set these terms clearly at the onset, including stipulating payment terms, renewal terms, financing limits, and potential price escalations.

Organizations must understand market rates and budget constraints for a solid negotiation foundation. Technical specifications, service levels, and autorenewal conditions are critical for EULAs. MSAs, software license agreements, and other technology contracts.

Termination clauses and notice periods are key for seamless auto-renewals. Organizations must thoroughly examine the existing agreement and its performance and negotiate for any adjustments that need to be made based on changing circumstances. Perhaps an organization’s financing procedures change from yearly budgets to monthly? In that case, during autorenewal, you may need to change payments to be staggered in negotiation.

These financial aspects are often the make-or-break points in negotiations. Too much compromise here can lead to financial strain down the line, or even risk the entire agreement. That’s why it is essential to establish boundaries within which negotiations must take place.

Negotiation Point #2 – Intellectual Property Rights

In our knowledge-driven world, intellectual property rights have become increasingly significant. When dealing with terms of access, use, sharing, and protection of intellectual property, ironclad negotiation instincts are crucial.

The rights to use, modify, or sell intellectual property can often form the core of contractual agreements. Any ambiguity can lead to disputes, financial loss, or reputation damage. In many cases, maintaining an iron grasp of intellectual property can be the overriding objective of a contract, making this aspect firmly non-negotiable as a territorial imperative.

Clearly drafted contracts should expressly who owns the intellectual property involved in the deal, and the scope of the licenses being granted from one party to the other.  Patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets must all be protected according to an organizations’ compliance and regulatory procedures. As such, organizations need to have tight language and clauses ready to bring to the negotiation table. They also need to make sure these important IP assets are not changed unless approved.

Negotiation Point #3 – Indemnification and Limitation of Liability

Another critical non-negotiable are the clauses covering indemnification and limitation of liability. These elements offer protection from unforeseen events, defining the responsibilities and potential penalties associated with breaches of contract and other risks.

Indemnification clauses ensure a party doesn’t bear the financial burden of an unforeseen event related to the agreement. Liability clauses spell out the penalties for contract breaches. Without clear language on these topics, one party could bear excessive risk, making these terms usually non-negotiable.

Here are some relevant points to consider:

  • Limitations: Clarify any limits on indemnity and liability to ensure they are reasonable and fair for both sides.
  • Third-Party Claims: Specify how third-party claims are handled in the event of legal disputes.
  • Procedures: Outline procedures for processing indemnity claims to avoid disputes and delays.
  • Proportional Responsibility: Determine how responsibility will be assigned to both parties is they contribute to a breach or other issues.

How To Negotiate Fairly

Fair negotiation is about creating a win-win situation, where both parties feel their needs are addressed and their interests protected. But how do you negotiate fairly?

Understanding your needs and the needs of the other party is the first step. By identifying key objectives, potential areas of compromise, and absolute deal-breakers, you lay the groundwork for a structured negotiation. Creating an environment of mutual respect is equally important, as it fosters open and honest communication—a critical element in any negotiation process.

Moreover, it is crucial to approach negotiations with a willingness to compromise. Rarely will one party get everything they want. An unrelenting stance can stifle discussions, and potentially lead to deadlock, a less favorable outcome, and unsalvageable rancor between parties going forward.

In conclusion, negotiating technology agreements is a delicate dance between maintaining your non-negotiable positions and being flexible where it benefits your objectives. Recognizing and understanding this balance is crucial to ensuring that the resulting contract is fair, balanced, and beneficial to all parties involved. Remember, your counterparty is not your nemesis; the aim is not to ‘win’ the negotiation but to create a robust, mutually beneficial contract that stands the test of time.

Want to learn more about how to streamline and automate legal operations? Book a free demo of leading contract lifecycle management software today!

About the Author

More Articles

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

De-Identified Data in SaaS Agreements

There is an increase in the significance of the right of a SaaS provider to “de-identify” or “anonymize”

6 Critical Elements of Indemnification Clauses in Business Transactions

Strategically crafting indemnification clauses is critical for delineating and distributing the risks associated with business transactions.

How to Build the Partnership Between Sales and Legal for Smoother Contracting

User-friendly processes and technology can help build a symbiotic relationship between Legal and Sales during contract reviews.

Sealing the Deal: Leveraging Contract Data to Power Your Negotiation Strategy

Leveraging contract data illuminates the areas ripe for efficiency and improving outcomes.

Most Recent

Four Ways to be Successful as a Contract Manager

The role of a Contract Manager is to get to know the business they’re in and reflect the

De-Identified Data in SaaS Agreements

There is an increase in the significance of the right of a SaaS provider to “de-identify” or “anonymize”

Understanding Performance-Based Contracting Methods

Using fairly-negotiated and well-managed performance-based contracts can help your company adapt to changes in the supply chain and

6 Critical Elements of Indemnification Clauses in Business Transactions

Strategically crafting indemnification clauses is critical for delineating and distributing the risks associated with business transactions.

Contract Nerds Logo

Download PDF

[download id='9545']
Search
Generic filters